On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:19 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Mar 5 septembre 2006 12:43, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 13:02 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> >> Perhaps in the case of mono, where the main package has no difference
> >> between the runtime and the development files (one in the same) then
> >> the .pc file can stay in the main package. I'm OK with that.
> >
> > So, can we change the packaging guidelines to say this? (Otherwise I'll
> > be flooded with more bug reports.)
>
> Even if a language does not distinguish between runtime and build files,
> you may still have to pull stuff used only for building (compiler, tools
> for %check, i18n, etc)
We don't require gcc or binutils in every package that includes a .pc
file, do we?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl@xxxxxxxxxx alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
He's an unconventional day-dreaming boxer living undercover at Ringling Bros.
Circus. She's a green-fingered impetuous angel from beyond the grave. They
fight crime!
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
