Le Mar 5 septembre 2006 15:25, Alexander Larsson a écrit : > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:19 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> Le Mar 5 septembre 2006 12:43, Alexander Larsson a écrit : >> > On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 13:02 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: >> >> >> Perhaps in the case of mono, where the main package has no difference >> >> between the runtime and the development files (one in the same) then >> >> the .pc file can stay in the main package. I'm OK with that. >> > >> > So, can we change the packaging guidelines to say this? (Otherwise >> I'll >> > be flooded with more bug reports.) >> >> Even if a language does not distinguish between runtime and build files, >> you may still have to pull stuff used only for building (compiler, tools >> for %check, i18n, etc) > > We don't require gcc or binutils in every package that includes a .pc > file, do we? That's only because those are the common ones. Make replacements, libs used for unit tests, etc... are not covered by the default package set. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
