On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 12:43 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > Perhaps in the case of mono, where the main package has no > difference > > between the runtime and the development files (one in the same) then > > the .pc file can stay in the main package. I'm OK with that. > > So, can we change the packaging guidelines to say this? (Otherwise > I'll > be flooded with more bug reports.) You are positive that your .pc files don't list any further software requirements that might be development in nature? If they did, this rule wouldn't apply. I would think that it would have to be something like this: If A) your package has no distinction between runtime and development libraries (example mono .dll files), and B) your .pc file lists no other development requirements, than your .pc file can go in the main package and not a sub -devel package. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
