On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 08:13 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 08:11 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 07:23:53AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > Well, that's a problem -- there's really not a lack of interest. There's > > > lack of resources, but not interest. And by definition, anyone who wants > > > RHL9 still supported will respond to the above with "But *I* am interested!" > > > > Then invite them to become the RHL9 legacy team and see how fast they shut > > up > > > > from personal experience they won't shut up. > > They'll just whine more yet do nothing. I suppose at some point it's just a matter of ignoring the whine. If they're not willing to help, and it's a small (yet vocal) group of people... it's their problem. It's not like RHL9 is anywhere near as nice for most things as current FC's are... their loss for not using it
