On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 08:11 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 07:23:53AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Well, that's a problem -- there's really not a lack of interest. There's > > lack of resources, but not interest. And by definition, anyone who wants > > RHL9 still supported will respond to the above with "But *I* am interested!" > > Then invite them to become the RHL9 legacy team and see how fast they shut > up > from personal experience they won't shut up. They'll just whine more yet do nothing. -sv