On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 06:54 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 06:58:38AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote: With all the > > > due respect Matthew but if people don't know CentOS by now, I > > > don't think that it is a bugzilla entry that will make any difference. > > You might be surprised then about the number of "Red Hat 9 is going away? I > > have NO CHOICE but to switch to [some other distro]" type comments Legacy > > gets. > Maybe the answer is "We offer you Fedora as other distro", and maybe it That's certainly *an* answer. However, someone who has stayed on RHL 9 for so long probably has done so because they really *don't* want a bunch of things which are design goals for Fedora, including "rapid change" and "leading edge". > can be preempted by saying "Due to lack of interest, RHL9 support is > going away". Well, that's a problem -- there's really not a lack of interest. There's lack of resources, but not interest. And by definition, anyone who wants RHL9 still supported will respond to the above with "But *I* am interested!" -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
