Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
From: Christopher Blizzard <blizzard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:05:29 -0400
In-reply-to: <20060707005935.GA3805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200607052140.k65LerJE001224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152136951.5277.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44ADB12C.4080509@xxxxxxxxxx> <20060707005935.GA3805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060613)

Bill Nottingham wrote:

Christopher Blizzard (blizzard@xxxxxxxxxx) said:

dwmw2 needs IPv6 for OLPC

Yeah, but we only need it for a limited subset of packages.


But... but... we're not shipping nethack on olpc?

Bill

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers


Can you say easter egg?

--Chris

References:
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Christian . Iseli
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Christopher Blizzard
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Bill Nottingham

Prev by Date: Re: Pre-orphaning annoucement for glabels and istanbul, looking for a new maintainer for both
Next by Date: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Next by thread: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux