Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:59:35 -0400
In-reply-to: <44ADB12C.4080509@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200607052140.k65LerJE001224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152136951.5277.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44ADB12C.4080509@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Christopher Blizzard (blizzard@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> >dwmw2 needs IPv6 for OLPC
> 
> Yeah, but we only need it for a limited subset of packages.

But... but... we're not shipping nethack on olpc?

Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Christopher Blizzard

References:
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Christian . Iseli
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Christopher Blizzard

Prev by Date: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Next by Date: Re: Pre-orphaning annoucement for glabels and istanbul, looking for a new maintainer for both
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Next by thread: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux