Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
From: Christopher Blizzard <blizzard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:56:12 -0400
In-reply-to: <1152136951.5277.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200607052140.k65LerJE001224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152136951.5277.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060613)

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

Now if dwmw2 wants to force all Core packages to support IPv6, that's finewith me.
dwmw2 needs IPv6 for OLPC


Yeah, but we only need it for a limited subset of packages.

--Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Bill Nottingham

References:
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Christian . Iseli
- Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot

Prev by Date: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Next by Date: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Next by thread: Re: Packaging guidelines: IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux