Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 14:58 -0500, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :
On 3/6/06, Christopher Blizzard <blizzard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But that it's focused in this one area. Having a generic "experimental"
tree will just result in piling on, and I would rather have focus in
this one problem domain for this one repo. And also the "experimental"
tree _is_ the devel tree. It's FC6. I just want to see us make real
gains with the relatively stable FC5 tree.
Isn't the people.redhat.com space the most appropriate place for this.
Some sort of official blessing and infrastructure to setup/teardown
repos would be probably easier on users and packagers.
Also, I seem to remember mharris for example was forced to make only a
part of his xorg experimental work public because he was hitting prc
quotas
Yep, and I think I have more disk quota allocated than anyone else
on the machine (2Gb). Modular X will greatly reduce the amount of
space I previously needed, except for RHEL3/4 updates, but I'm looking
at moving my public rpms to mharris.ca instead.
--
Mike A. Harris * Open Source Advocate * http://mharris.ca
Proud Canadian.
