Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 14:58 -0500, Jeff Spaleta a écrit : > On 3/6/06, Christopher Blizzard <blizzard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But that it's focused in this one area. Having a generic "experimental" > > tree will just result in piling on, and I would rather have focus in > > this one problem domain for this one repo. And also the "experimental" > > tree _is_ the devel tree. It's FC6. I just want to see us make real > > gains with the relatively stable FC5 tree. > > Isn't the people.redhat.com space the most appropriate place for this. Some sort of official blessing and infrastructure to setup/teardown repos would be probably easier on users and packagers. Also, I seem to remember mharris for example was forced to make only a part of his xorg experimental work public because he was hitting prc quotas -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
