Re: Stricter rpmbuild with unpackaged files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Nasrat wrote :

> The unpackaged files checks now catch unpackaged symlinks. As per FC4
> tracker request
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108778

Could this have caused nasty side-effects? As of today, my mach chroots
(tested on x86_64 and ppc) had builds fail with rpmbuild complaining about
unpackaged files... which were symlinks in the both cases I encountered.
The thing is, they _were_ listed in %files, and when I tried also listing
them explicitly (it was a wildcard previously), then it failed with the
same unpackaged files message _and_ complained that they were listed
twice :-/

I got really puzzled and just set my rpmmacros to not terminate builds on
unpackaged files for now.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC3
Load : 0.09 0.32 0.35


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux