Re: Stricter rpmbuild with unpackaged files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 21:28 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Paul Nasrat wrote :
> 
> > The unpackaged files checks now catch unpackaged symlinks. As per FC4
> > tracker request
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108778
> 
> Could this have caused nasty side-effects? As of today, my mach chroots
> (tested on x86_64 and ppc) had builds fail with rpmbuild complaining about
> unpackaged files... which were symlinks in the both cases I encountered.
> The thing is, they _were_ listed in %files, and when I tried also listing
> them explicitly (it was a wildcard previously), then it failed with the
> same unpackaged files message _and_ complained that they were listed
> twice :-/

This shouldn't have happened AFAIK.  Could you please file in bugzilla
with a simple reproducible spec.

Paul


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux