Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2005, 08:25 -0400 schrieb Greg DeKoenigsberg: > +1 > > Tracker bugs are good in so many ways. x86_64: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157553 > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2005, 08:55 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:32:06 +1000, Colin Charles wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 07:36 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > How about the date get set to start around 26th May? This gives us > > > > relatively enough time to rebuild, and get things fixed before 6th June. > > > Fedora Extras FC4 target bugs > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=157183 > > > > > > (would be great if the dep tree listed the architecture, too, btw) > > > > We could create more tracker bugs: "FC4 x86_64 tracker" "FC4 ppc > > tracker"; Those could be dep bugs for the "FC4 general tracker" bug. You > > would see the arch deps in that dependecytree then. > > > > Similar like Bug 155836 in the dep-tree of > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=136450 > > > > I was planing something like that anyway to track x86_64 bugs better. > > > > Just my 2 cent > > > > -- > > Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > -- > > Fedora-maintainers mailing list > > Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers > > > > -- > Fedora-maintainers mailing list > Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers > -- Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
