Re: mismatch of versions between arches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2005, 08:55 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:32:06 +1000, Colin Charles wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 07:36 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > How about the date get set to start around 26th May? This gives us
> > relatively enough time to rebuild, and get things fixed before 6th June.
> Fedora Extras FC4 target bugs
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=157183
> 
> (would be great if the dep tree listed the architecture, too, btw)

We could create more tracker bugs: "FC4 x86_64 tracker"  "FC4 ppc
tracker"; Those could be dep bugs for the "FC4 general tracker" bug. You
would see the arch deps in that dependecytree then. 

Similar like Bug 155836 in the dep-tree of 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=136450

I was planing something like that anyway to track x86_64 bugs better.

Just my 2 cent

-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux