On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:32:06 +1000, Colin Charles wrote: > On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 07:36 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > The explanation is a different one. Fedora pre-Extras started with > > i386/x86_64 builds only and published whatever did built on i386. No > > ppc > > builds were done. Only later build failures on one arch have started > > to > > block an entire release. > > Wrong; they were being built here at home right up until pre-FC4t2 for > ppc (when Seth got a build box, and I stopped) Wrong or right, doesn't matter at all. There's a huge discrepancy between what packages we have on each of the architectures. And really nobody else has the overview of what was built for ppc and what was not. > > And no mass-rebuild for ppc was done either when a ppc build box was > > introduced. > > I reckon as FC-4 becomes near, we need a mass rebuild on all arch's, one > way or another Or just a rebuild of packages, which have not been built with gcc4 yet. > How about the date get set to start around 26th May? This gives us > relatively enough time to rebuild, and get things fixed before 6th June. Fedora Extras FC4 target bugs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=157183 (would be great if the dep tree listed the architecture, too, btw)
