Re: What if we moved to Discourse?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Adam,

I personally like Discourse, and think it is a good move to make the
discussion side of the magazine open up more. I was pointing out that
the move didn't solve the issue of, well using issues on Pagure to
track concept ideas or pitches. Perhaps a VCS approach is not meant for
magazine article workflow, but meh. 
So I am +1 for the #2 option with the proposal and discussion happening
in one location (Discourse) and a tool (Taiga) for tracking progress
through the pitch/write/publish cycle. This seems the most appropriate
approach.
I was also personally very reluctant to propose (another) bit of Fedora
move from Pagure use. 

Regards,
Stephen

On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 10:45 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> So I've read all the comments and I feel there are a few people for
> the
> move and no one clearly against. But we have some concerns or
> undecided, too.
> 
> Some of the pros are that a forum is more accessible and feels more
> inclusive and open to newcomers. There were also comments about
> mailing
> lists being seen as confusing or even archaic.
> 
> Some of you just like the idea of consolidation of our channels and
> are for
> the change for this reason.
> 
> Also, we had some confusion about new creating accounts or proposing
> other
> self-hosting alternatives. I'm only proposing Discourse because
> Fedora
> already has one, and it works with the Fedora account system:
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/ So there are no new accounts
> involved, and we won't be deploying yet another service, just using
> what's
> already available.
> 
> And then there was one concern about this proposal not solving the
> problem
> with having Pagure separated. And while I kind of agree it's not
> solving
> the disconnect directly, I believe that moving all the discussions
> into one
> place helps people see the proposals and engage with them more. And
> yes,
> we'll still need to make a card for each article, but it will be
> easier to
> just see it and do it. Or we can ask the person proposing the idea to
> create the card and link back to the discussion. I think that just
> the fact
> of it being more visible helps. And the reason I propose moving to
> Discourse (rather than using the mailing list for this) is the
> accessibility and the ability to easily link to the discussion.
> 
> I realize it's not a perfect solution, but I think it's the best
> reasonable
> option we have. We're basically choosing between the following three
> solutions:
> 
> 1/ Keep what we have now. Proposals in Pagure, general discussion on
> the
> list, tracking in Taiga.
> 2/ Proposals AND general discussion in Discourse, tracking in Taiga.
> 3/ The same as 2, but using a mailing list. So proposals and
> discussion on
> the list, and tracking in Taiga.
> 
> Options 2 and 3 have all the discussions in one place — being it
> proposals
> or anything else. But what I propose, option 2, is to have a place
> that's
> more accessible, more open to newcomers or casual contributors, and
> easy to
> link to.
> 
> And even if we somehow automated the process of creating Taiga cards
> from
> Pagure, or moved the proposals directly to Taiga, we'd still had
> discussion
> on two different places, keeping the engagement on the proposals
> quite low
> as we have it now.
> 
> 
> So, to move forward, are there people strongly against? Especially
> those of
> you who are concerned. Or are we willing to give this a shot?
> 
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:25 AM Clement Verna <
> cverna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 16:15, Adam Samalik <asamalik@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > What if we moved to Discourse [1]?
> > > 
> > > We touched this during today's meeting [2] towards the end.
> > > 
> > > Right now we have various things in three different places:
> > > 1/ This mailing list for general discussion
> > > 2/ Pagure repository [3] for article proposals and discussion
> > > around those
> > > 3/ Taiga board [4] to track the editorial workflow
> > > 
> > > Discourse would replace this mailing list and the Pagure
> > > repository, so
> > > we'd have one place to discuss anything. And unlike a mailing
> > > list, we
> > > could link to individual threads easily, new members could join
> > > us and see
> > > all the previous discussions, etc.
> > > 
> > > I especially like this for article proposals. More people would
> > > be able to
> > > see them and comment on them, and after a proposal gets approved
> > > we could
> > > easily link the thread from the Taiga card.
> > > 
> > > Back in 2017-1018, the Forman community did a similar move [5]
> > > [6] and
> > > their engagement doubled. But it's a different community and a
> > > few years
> > > back, so it doesn't promise anything to us. But I still find it
> > > interesting.
> > > 
> > > What do people think?
> > > 
> > 
> > I am generally +1 to move to discourse but I also don't participate
> > that
> > much in this mailing list :-)
> > 
> > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Adam
> > > 
> > > [1] https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/
> > > [2]
> > > 
> > > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-05-27/magazine.2020-05-27-12.01.log.html
> > > [3] https://pagure.io/fedora-magazine-proposals/issues
> > > [4]
> > > https://teams.fedoraproject.org/project/asamalik-fedora-magazine/kanban
> > > [5] 
> > > https://theforeman.org/2017/12/foreman-migrates-to-discourse.html
> > > [6]
> > > https://theforeman.org/2018/07/discourse-6-months-on-impact-assesment.html
> > > 
> > > --
> > > 
> > > Adam Šamalík
> > > ---------------------------
> > > Senior Software Engineer
> > > Red Hat
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to 
> > > magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: 
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Adam Šamalík
> ---------------------------
> Senior Software Engineer
> Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to 
> magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux