Hi Paul: Thanks, I took you advice for my own article and just responded to the critique with a more detailed explanation of what I was trying to say. A similar situation has just arisen with another article -- Story Teller's article is being criticized for suggesting that selinux be disabled and he has requested that the document be revised (last comment on kanban's #101: https://teams.fedoraproject.org/project/asamalik-fedora-magazine/us/101). Should I revise the article or should Story Teller just reply to the comments? Also, I haven't been approving the comments. Is that something that you want me to do? Thanks. On Fri, 2020-01-24 at 12:45 +0100, Paul Frields wrote: > The best way to deal with this comment IMHO is just to politely respond. ... > > In general, I don't think we should remove things once published (except in a case like a bad/duplicate paste), and in those cases, provide an "EDIT:" note in the article to show what's changed. Just my $0.02. > > Paul _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
