So should we give this a try this week? I'll get everything in place before the meeting! On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:35 PM Paul Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:48 AM Clement Verna <cverna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 12:38, Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:12 PM Adam Samalik <asamalik@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > > I'd like to propose we use a Taiga kanban board to track the state > of our > > > > articles and the publishing schedule. > > > > > > > > Having a board will have multiple benefits, including: > > > > - Quick overview of the current state and the publishing schedule > > > > - Writing comments to the articles — things to remember when > editing, etc. > > > > - Ability to move some of our activities from the meeting to the > board, > > > > such as +1's on the pitches, assigning edits and images, or even > scheduling > > > > in some cases — that could give us more time in the meeting for other > > > > discussions that need to happen real-time > > > > - A board will be also more intuitive and accessible to newcomers > > > > > > > > What do you think? Do we wanna give this a try? To give people a > better > > > > idea I've created an example board [1] in the teams.fp.o Taiga. > > > > > > > > > > Wordpress has most of this stuff already (or we did at some point with > some > > > of the plugins), but we have never really used it to any extent, and it > > > also is kind of hard to keep track of it from the birds-eye view that > taiga > > > will give us. > > > > > > A quick google search suggests that there really arent any plugins or > > > anything to integrate between wordpress and taiga, so when something > > > changes state (i.e. a pitch to a draft), we will have to manually > change it > > > in both places, right? > > > > My understanding was that we would move the state management of > > articles in taiga. So I am not sure if still need all the current > > categories in wordpress ? Otherwise I think the weekly meeting would > > be a good place to maintain the board so IMO we would really only move > > cards in taiga during the meeting. > > That would let us remove a couple 'status' values, yes. And that might > simplify some issues with writers not being able to access their > articles once they're in Pending Review. We might just have the > default status values in that case and maybe simplify the ACLs. > > I'm game for this. It would be great if someone can write up a *page* > on the WP proposing how the workflow will work. > > Paul > -- Adam Šamalík --------------------------- Senior Software Engineer Red Hat _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
