The original article beforeediting didn't have any direct hints about specific utilities, commands to run, etc. So I tried to keep the same sense around the article that Sylvia, the original author, intended. In some cases, there were two separate and distinct tips combined into one, so I separated them for clarity. I also tried to order them in terms of "depth" for where they took the user. I did look at the revisions Corey saved. Those revisions were light and didn't alter that general feel. I didn't see anything in those revisions that mentioned specific tools or commands. Perhaps there's an unsaved copy that didn't make it into the Wordpress instance? I would agree with Eduard and Link the article is fairly general. I tried to clarify what was there, put it in an order that would make as much sense to the reader as possible, make it concise for the typical modern reader (as well as international/ESL audiences), and keep the sense of the original author's work. Paul On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Eduard Lucena <eduardlucena@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi team, > > Maybe I'm out of scope here, but I need to agreed with Link: How is this > related with Fedora or any open source or free software? An article about > scurity tips isn't good just because it has the word cryptography on it. > The tips given are just superficial, it doesn't have anything specific > about a browser or any software, how something differs from one to another, > when something is mentioned, it doesn't say how to do it. I think the > article need more work, no just editing, but more content. > > Br, > > 2017-02-04 2:16 GMT-03:00 Link Dupont <link@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 03:06 +0000, Corey W Sheldon wrote: >> > it ACTUALLY mentioned how and what tools to use to do these things? >> >> I agree with Corey here. The better articles we publish are the ones >> that instruct *how* to do something (think of the GnuPG series). The >> GnuPG articles were salient enough that they could be used as a guide >> on setting up a GPG key and securing your email with it. >> >> This article doesn't offer any lasting value to the reader. How does >> this relate to Fedora? Maybe a better spin on this would be "Making >> Fedora more secure"? Or "Securing Fedora for use in a public setting"? >> >> ~link >> _______________________________________________ >> Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> > > > -- > Eduard Lucena > Móvil: +56962318010 > GNU/Linux User #589060 > Ubuntu User #8749 > Fedora Ambassador Latam > _______________________________________________ > Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
