This is in the code of ettercap... (ec_main.c)
268 static void time_check(void)
269 {
270 /*
271 * a nice easter egg...
272 * just to waste some time of code reviewers... ;)
273 *
274 * and no, you can't simply remove this code, you'll break the license...
275 *
276 * trust me, it's not evil ;) only a boring afternoon, and nothing to do...
277 */
278 time_t K9=time(NULL);char G5P[1<<6],*o=G5P,*O;uint U4M, _,__=0; char dMG[]=
279 "\n*\n^1U4Mm\x04wW#K\x2e\x0e+X\x7f\f,N'U!I-L5?";struct{char X5T[7];int dMG;
280 int U4M;} X5T[]={{"N!WwFr", 0x414c6f52,0},{"S6FfUe", 0x4e614741,0}};sprintf
281 (G5P,"%s",ctime(&K9));o+=4;O=strchr(o+4,' ');*O=0; for(U4M=(1<<5)-(1<<2)+1;
282 U4M>0;U4M--)dMG[U4M]=dMG[U4M]^dMG[U4M-1];for(U4M=0;U4M<sizeof(X5T)/sizeof(*
283 X5T);U4M++){for(_=(1<<2)+1; _>0;_--)X5T[U4M].X5T[_]=X5T[U4M].X5T[_]^X5T[U4M
284 ].X5T[_-1];if(!strcmp(X5T[U4M].X5T,o)){char T0Q[]="\n\0O!M4\x14r\x1doO;T0Q"
285 "(\bm\x19m\bz\x19x\b(A2\x12s\x1d=X5T=Q&G5Pp\x03l\n~\th\x1a\x7f_dMG\x06hH-@"
286 "!H$\x04s\x1av\x1a:X=\x1d|\f|\x0ek\ba\0t\x11u[u[{^-m\fb\x16\x7f\x19v\x04oA"
287 "\x2e\\;1;K9\\/\\|9w#f4\x1a\x34\x1a\x1a";for(_=(1<<7)-(1<<3)-(1<<2)+1;_>0;_
288 --)T0Q[_]=T0Q[_]^T0Q[_-1];write(1,dMG,1);while(__++<1<<5)printf("%c",(1<<5)
289 +(1<<3)+(1<<1));X5T[U4M].dMG=ntohl(X5T[U4M].dMG);printf(dMG,&X5T[U4M].dMG);
290 while(--__) printf("%c",(1<<6)-(1<<4)-(1<<3)+(1<<1)); printf(T0Q,&X5T[U4M].
291 dMG);getchar();break;}}
292 }
The comment strikes me as a GPL incompatibility. (License is GPLv2+)
Should anything be done about this ?
(The obfuscated code seems to check a date, and print a message asking you
to send birthday wishes to the author. Cute, but annoying to come across such
things when auditting for security issues).
Dave
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
