On 02/07/2011 04:06 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:12PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: >> On 02/07/2011 03:52 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: >>> Maybe it's only >>> practical for Fedora to label this as "GPLv2 or GPLv3", and if in the >>> distant future the KDE organization also approved GPLv4 the license >>> tag could just be updated accordingly (much like any special license >>> change might be treated). Look to spot for the official answer though. >> >> I think this is sensible. Handle it like this: >> >> # KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted >> License: GPLv2 and GPLv3 > > Shouldn't it be "GPLv2 or GPLv3"? It's like a (disjunctive) dual > license. Yes, you're right. It is a Monday. # KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted License: GPLv2 or GPLv3 ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
