On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:12PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 02/07/2011 03:52 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > > Maybe it's only > > practical for Fedora to label this as "GPLv2 or GPLv3", and if in the > > distant future the KDE organization also approved GPLv4 the license > > tag could just be updated accordingly (much like any special license > > change might be treated). Look to spot for the official answer though. > > I think this is sensible. Handle it like this: > > # KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted > License: GPLv2 and GPLv3 Shouldn't it be "GPLv2 or GPLv3"? It's like a (disjunctive) dual license. - RF _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
