Re: Forced copyright assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:49, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that it really has come up before. I would wholeheartedly
> agree with you that firmware hex code is not "the preferred form of the
> work for making modifications to it", but I'm also not sure whether the
> copyright holder (the licensor) or the licensee is the one who
> determines what is preferred.
>
> To put it bluntly, you might have to sue them to get the raw firmware
> source.

A lot of firmware I dealt with back in the day ONLY had hex code as
the source. I doubt that is the case these days but it was how the
guys liked to twiddle the bits as raw as they could.





-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux