Hello All! 2011/1/15 lakshminaras2002@xxxxxxxxx <lakshminaras2002@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hello Peter, > I am reviewing erlang-skerl and the issue I am facing is similar to what > Ville-Pekka reports. In this case, some of the c source/header files and > erlang source files are without license headers. > Could you ask upstream to include license headers in the source code files > of both packages / or confirm the licensing of those files? I already contacted Justin Sheeny, one of the upstream developers, regarding legal status of the erlang-bitcask. He replied that these files are indeed SSL 2.0 licensed, and the necessary headers will be added to these files very soon (only in SCM - no tarballs with already released versions will be recreated and re-released). Also he kindly granted us permission to redistribute doc-file freely w/o modifications. I hope that it's ok for content. Regarding the rest of the files in question (in erlang-skerl and possibly in some other Riak-related packages) - I'll try to figure out which source-files still don't have a necessary legal info and I'll notify upstream in a couple of days (or, at least, next week). Right now I think I should add FE-LEGAL blocker to all the reviews in question (to erlang-skerl and possibly to some others) , and will unblock them as soon as I will get confirmation from upstream. I will not add FE-LEGAL to erlang-bitcask since the issue was already resolved. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
