Hi, I'm reviewing erlang-bitcask for Fedora: <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652623>. A good way of browsing through upstream source is here: <https://bitbucket.org/basho/bitcask/src>. Upstream doesn't have a LICENSE file or similar and the license is not mentioned in the README file either. I have two licensing related questions: 1. All other relevant source files have a license header except include/bitcask.hrl and c_src/erl_nif_compat.h. I'm not sure if they constitute a "work" in terms of copyright and should have licenses. What do you think? 2. This is, to me, the more important question. There is a .pdf file and some .png files in the doc directory. To me these seem like works which are under copyright, but I can't find a license for them anywhere in the source tree. Does this make them non-free and non-redistributable? -- Ville-Pekka Vainio _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
