On 11/23/2010 10:04 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > I am doing review of old/new package - visualvm [1]. It used to be part > of openjdk until recently. > > spec file contains multiple source tarballs. > * netbeans-profiler-visualvm_release69.tar.gz contains dual-licensed > files (GPLv2 with classpath exception or CDDL) > * visualvm_harness-*tar - GPLv2 > * visualvm_13-src.tar.gz - GPLv2+ > > The jars from profiler tarball are separate (files from it are not mixed > into any other package, so classpath exception should be "working" as I > understand it). > > Harness tar is basically just configure scripts and build instructions. > > visualvm_13-src contains the main application compiled using harness, > the jars from profiler tar are used as plugins. > > I'd say it's OK to have this mix, but I'd like to be sure about exact > License tag that is appropriate here. Maybe: The mix seems fine, but since the works are separate, I would use: # Exception is classpath License: GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and (GPLv2 with exceptions or CDDL) Thanks, ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
