I am doing review of old/new package - visualvm [1]. It used to be part of openjdk until recently. spec file contains multiple source tarballs. * netbeans-profiler-visualvm_release69.tar.gz contains dual-licensed files (GPLv2 with classpath exception or CDDL) * visualvm_harness-*tar - GPLv2 * visualvm_13-src.tar.gz - GPLv2+ The jars from profiler tarball are separate (files from it are not mixed into any other package, so classpath exception should be "working" as I understand it). Harness tar is basically just configure scripts and build instructions. visualvm_13-src contains the main application compiled using harness, the jars from profiler tar are used as plugins. I'd say it's OK to have this mix, but I'd like to be sure about exact License tag that is appropriate here. Maybe: License: GPLv2+ and (GPLv2 with classpath exception or CDDL) Thanks, [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640205 -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 71A1677C Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
