-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 21.09.2010 21:34, schrieb Tom "spot" Callaway: >> The gpl.txt file included in the package is of version 3 of the >> license, but the preamble doesn't state a version. Is this >> okay? > > It's okay, but if no version is specified in the code or > corresponding documentation (note: _NOT_ COPYING), then it is GPL+. > Why not COPYING? If an author copying a license text in his upstream distribution, their declares that the terms written down in this document should be apply to this work which should release. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAkyZCz8ACgkQZLAIBz9lVu9mhgP/VYufcPqPkZ726zZ77o1nhGnG LHmYnoQkx0tHrQ3Nifr8zM5fheMJHDl/Gdm+5LfgogD6BIYeD7bl4sq5OIKM0ljq ar3AfJSKMOC2ZE3Yx40yrURED2Ls/tip0PcYafMxMrizgd0FU4wIIfBd91f6ujU0 yd9KQJGS1fP472zgJcU= =bti/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
