On 09/21/2010 03:08 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Spot - could you comment on this? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636250 > > Source files have the following preamble: > > HotEqn is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > the Free Software Foundation; > HotEqn is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > GNU General Public License for more details. > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > > The gpl.txt file included in the package is of version 3 of the license, but > the preamble doesn't state a version. Is this okay? It's okay, but if no version is specified in the code or corresponding documentation (note: _NOT_ COPYING), then it is GPL+. ~spot _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
