>>>>> "LV" == Luis Villa <luis@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: LV> I know lack of reviewers is already a serious bottleneck in the LV> process; would having a separate cadre of license reviewers mean LV> more delays? How could it possibly be so, unless a separate license review was somehow made a blocker to the process? That's not what's being proposed. At worse, nobody would do separate license reviews and the regular package reviewers would continue as they do now. At best, all packages would be checked for license issues before the regular package review happens, and package reviewers can avoid worrying about license issues. Reality will probably be somewhere in between. Any separate license review takes work off of the already far overworked package reviewers; I can't imagine how that could hurt. I don't know how fossology works, but if there's any way I can automate calling it then I'll be happy to look into it. Currently automation would be limited to a tool that would pick a ticket which needs license review, pull down the most recent posted srpm, unpack it and drop you into a shell to look around, and automatically updating bugzilla. Plenty of possibility to hang other tools off of that, except that I don't really know of any that could be run. - J< _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
