On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> 1) I came across another review with the same license question. The >> source files have one of the >> GPLv2, GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ headers each. They get compiled and produce >> 1 final binary executable. None of the headers (or other source code >> files) go to the final RPM. >> >> What goes to the license tag of the package? >> >> Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325#c4 >> >> 2) Hypothetical question (although happens rather frequently): What if >> there was a -devel subpackage and .h files with different licenses >> ended up in this -devel subpackage? > > Aren't both questions answered pretty well by > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines ? > Nope. I wouldn't ask if they were. Orcan _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
