On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > 1) I came across another review with the same license question. The > source files have one of the > GPLv2, GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ headers each. They get compiled and produce > 1 final binary executable. None of the headers (or other source code > files) go to the final RPM. > > What goes to the license tag of the package? > > Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325#c4 > > 2) Hypothetical question (although happens rather frequently): What if > there was a -devel subpackage and .h files with different licenses > ended up in this -devel subpackage? Aren't both questions answered pretty well by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines ? _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
