On 10/22/2009 05:32 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > So I tried to translate the Japanese FDclone license into English > by myself. I hope that my translation will be more readable. > > http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/FDclone/LICENSE.en.retranslated.txt It is more readable, but unfortunately, it is still not clear to me whether that license is acceptable or not. Can you ask the license author the following questions? * When Fedora redistributes code (binary or source) under the FDClone license (secondary (or more) distribution or circulation), is it a requirement that Fedora _must_ follow the steps in section 9 (Procedure for Circulation Registration)? Or is it optional? I think that having the answer to those questions will help us determine whether it is acceptable or not. Thanks, ~tom _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
