Re: CC BY SA 3.0 unported or ported or ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Karsten Wade<kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yeah, that's my read.  Ported have been localized, presumably either
> in a local language or perhaps even legally vetted ... I'm not clear
> which.

So my take from the peanut gallery is that since RHT is a US
corporation, we have to use either the US or unported license for all
of the RHT-originated docs.

Looking at http://creativecommons.org/international/ it appears that
the actual text of the license gets changed to jive with the legal
systems of particular countries.

Just my $0.02 from the peanut gallery :)

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux