Re: CC BY SA 3.0 unported or ported or ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:47:28PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Karsten Wade<kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Which do we want to use when relicening all Fedora content and as our
> > default license choice (for now)?  Or is it really a three-way choice?
> 
> Call me an id10t, but I'm not sure what the differences are.  Is it
> just that the text of the license is adapted to a specific country's
> laws?  Or is there something more going on that I'm not sure of???

Yeah, that's my read.  Ported have been localized, presumably either
in a local language or perhaps even legally vetted ... I'm not clear
which.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41

Attachment: pgpJQ6LbO6MVd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux