On 07/05/2009 02:18 PM, Christian Krause wrote: > Hello, > > during a package review I have found another BSD/MIT license issue for > which I'd like to get some advice: > > The package "ewl" from the enlightenment project contains a COPYING file > [1] which looks much more similar to an MIT license then to a BSD license. > > However, the spec file which is included in the upstream tarball > explicitly states BSD. > In various discussions on their mailing list "E-devel" the developers > also usually refer only to the BSD license (e.g. [2]). > > Any help is appreciated! The license you're referencing is: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT_With_Advertising Free, but GPL incompatible. Use this for the spec: License: MIT with advertising The fact that upstream incorrectly refers to it as "BSD" is irrelevant. :) ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list