BSD vs. MIT license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

during a package review I have found another BSD/MIT license issue for
which I'd like to get some advice:

The package "ewl" from the enlightenment project contains a COPYING file
  [1] which looks much more similar to an MIT license then to a BSD license.

However, the spec file which is included in the upstream tarball
explicitly states BSD.
In various discussions on their mailing list "E-devel" the developers
also usually refer only to the BSD license (e.g. [2]).

Any help is appreciated!


Best regards,
Christian

[1]
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/ewl/COPYING

[2]
http://www.mail-archive.com/enlightenment-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg17994.html

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux