CEPL license - acceptable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: CEPL license - acceptable?
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 05:28:56 +0530
Organization: Red Hat
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090324 Fedora/3.0-2.1.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2

Hi

It is a MPL variant but I would like legal to review the variations.

http://www.celtx.com/CePL/

Rahul

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

Prev by Date: Re: Question on legal issues
Next by Date: python openssl/gpl license issue?
Previous by thread: Question on legal issues
Next by thread: Re: CEPL license - acceptable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Gnome Users] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux