Tom "spot" Callaway píše v Čt 26. 02. 2009 v 13:28 -0500: > On 2009-02-26 at 9:59:36 -0500, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Spot, > > > > you will probably remember that you were checking the OpenCascade Public > > License few moth ago. Now the question about its free/nonfree status was > > opened on the upstream forum and it would be a good chance to express > > our (or better RH Legal's) reasons that led to the decision that it is > > non-free and possibly make upstream to resolve them. > > > > I am including the mail I got from Debian packagers. > > > > URL of the discussion is > > http://www.opencascade.org/org/forum/thread_15859/ > > Dan, I've posted to that thread with the information about why that > license is non-free. Many thanks Spot. They are now looking for a standard license that will meet their requirements. Could you take a look at the forum once more? Thanks, Dan _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
