On 2009-02-26 at 9:59:36 -0500, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Spot, > > you will probably remember that you were checking the OpenCascade Public > License few moth ago. Now the question about its free/nonfree status was > opened on the upstream forum and it would be a good chance to express > our (or better RH Legal's) reasons that led to the decision that it is > non-free and possibly make upstream to resolve them. > > I am including the mail I got from Debian packagers. > > URL of the discussion is > http://www.opencascade.org/org/forum/thread_15859/ Dan, I've posted to that thread with the information about why that license is non-free. Thanks, ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
