On 2009-02-16 at 18:56:20 -0500, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:45:25PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: >> On 2009-02-16 at 14:42:30 -0500, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >>>> On 2008-12-26 at 5:50:31 -0500, "Andrea Musuruane" <musuruan@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> I'd like to now if xBill is suitable for inclusion in Fedora: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.xbill.org/ >>>>> >>>>> License, as stated in the man entry, is GPL (no version specified). >>>>> >>>>> My concerns regard the use of various logos in the game. >>>>> >>>>> Also note that this game has been packaged until 2001 in Red Hat. >>>> Red Hat Legal says this is not acceptable. >>> Is it because of the artwork? We can get it replaced. >> Well, the issue is that the game is clearly disparaging Microsoft and >> its marks. I'm not sure any amount of "artwork" replacement will >> overcome that. > > We don't have any right to redistribute parody?!? There is a difference between parody and disparagement. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
