On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:45:25PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On 2009-02-16 at 14:42:30 -0500, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > >> On 2008-12-26 at 5:50:31 -0500, "Andrea Musuruane" <musuruan@xxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> I'd like to now if xBill is suitable for inclusion in Fedora: > >>> > >>> http://www.xbill.org/ > >>> > >>> License, as stated in the man entry, is GPL (no version specified). > >>> > >>> My concerns regard the use of various logos in the game. > >>> > >>> Also note that this game has been packaged until 2001 in Red Hat. > >> > >> Red Hat Legal says this is not acceptable. > > > > Is it because of the artwork? We can get it replaced. > > Well, the issue is that the game is clearly disparaging Microsoft and > its marks. I'm not sure any amount of "artwork" replacement will > overcome that. We don't have any right to redistribute parody?!? - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgp2fHdYPwJSg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
