On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:53:49AM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:52:43 +0000 > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > APSL 1.0 is listed in Bad Licenses. Is this because it is non-free, > > or because it was deprecated and replaced (latest version of the > > license is APSL 2.0) ? > > > > I had a look at the license text[1] and it seems like clause 2.1 would > > make it non-free. But I'm no expert on this stuff ... > > > > [1] http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/1.0.txt > > See > http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/historical-apsl.html Interesting, thanks. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/ Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
