On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:52:43 +0000 "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > APSL 1.0 is listed in Bad Licenses. Is this because it is non-free, > or because it was deprecated and replaced (latest version of the > license is APSL 2.0) ? > > I had a look at the license text[1] and it seems like clause 2.1 would > make it non-free. But I'm no expert on this stuff ... > > [1] http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/1.0.txt See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/historical-apsl.html - RF _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
