On 15 Aug 2008 21:13:58 -0500 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> "RF" == Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > RF> Disclaimer: IAARHL, IANYL, TINLA > > No problem. However, please forgive this response for I am new to > this list and don't know who everyone is. I simply do not know if > should take your comments as rendered opinion for the purposes of > acceptance of packages into Fedora. Oh, I wasn't rendering any sort of official opinion for Fedora (I would look to spot for that). Rather, I think the question is an unusually easy one to answer. No one ought to use code that has no licensing information in it, and I think it's best to assume that it's too risky for anyone to rely on an informal statement on a web site. Educating upstream developers about this is a good idea, of course. - RF _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
