Disclaimer: IAARHL, IANYL, TINLA On 15 Aug 2008 18:22:46 -0500 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The problem is code which has no license information at all. > Sometimes there are copyright notices, sometimes not, and no mention > whatsoever of any type of license. However, there's a mention of a > license at the upstream web site. > > Now, obviously upstream should be prodded to get with the program. > But in the interim, is it sufficient to simply refer to the upstream > web site? Keep a copy of it in the package (in case they decide to > change it for some reason)? Or should this kind of software be > avoided entirely until upstream decides to release a version with a > properly included license? I'd say the last option is the most appropriate one. - RF _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
