On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:06:57PM -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote: > First I would like to say to those who say Fedora Legacy has failed, that > it _did_ work (i.e. didn't fail) for the most critical time period and the > most critical OS version (RHL 7-9, FC1). If it has failed, or is failing, > it must not be forgotten that before it failed it worked exceedingly well. Or at least moderately well. Let's not over-sell. :) > Second, I'm fairly comfortable with saying that if FC goes to a 13 month > support cycle, FL is basically not needed anymore. IMHO, people can upgrade > once a year when presented with a known/documented release cycle, and known > documented alternatives. One month of annual overlap is still a bit short. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
