On Tuesday 14 November 2006 23:06, Eric Rostetter wrote: > First I would like to say to those who say Fedora Legacy has failed, that > it _did_ work (i.e. didn't fail) for the most critical time period and the > most critical OS version (RHL 7-9, FC1). If it has failed, or is failing, > it must not be forgotten that before it failed it worked exceedingly well. YES! I forgot to mention this in my blog, but when we were doing the RHL updates, there was a LOT of interest and a lot of community participation, and the project worked pretty darn well. I think it became evident by the dramatic drop in participation that there just wasn't the interest we thought there would be in long term Fedora releases. This is why I think its OK in slightly extending the 'official' lifespan and bringing Legacy in to help with that aspect. Thank you for your feedback Eric, you've forever kept us honest! (: -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp1D7txv5IYD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
