Martin Marques wrote: > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 06:45, Martin Marques wrote: >> >>> Would you people like to see the patches first or do I send the src.rpm? >> >> >> Either way. We now manage FC-4 in CVS so adding just a patch to generate a >> updates-testing rpm is easy enough. > > > OK. I finished adding patches to mailman from RHEL to FC4, risulting in > the next src.rpm: > > http://bugs.unl.edu.ar/~martin/mailman-2.1.8-1.FC4.1.legacy.src.rpm > > Also have a binary: > > http://bugs.unl.edu.ar/~martin/mailman-2.1.8-1.FC4.1.legacy.i386.rpm > > At this moment I can't test the rpm because the only FC4 I have is a > dedicated server. But be sure that the only change I add from privoius > version was add the las 2 patches (see the .spec file). > > Let me know how things work out. Thanks a bunch, Martin! :) Info on your source package has been placed into Bugzilla #209891 <http://tinyurl.com/yje83r>, and hopefully we'll soon have this QA'ed and published in the Legacy repositories! We still need work on the FC3 version of this package: mailman-2.1.5-32.fc3.src.rpm in Bugzilla #211676. Thanks again. :) -David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
